Module 1
Take the Knowledge Check
- What is the difference between research and quality improvement (QI)? Describe at least two key distinctions.
- Which of the following tools can be used to identify root causes of a problem?
- Bar graph
- Fishbone diagram
- SurveyMonkey
- Process map
- Name one quantitative and one qualitative data source used in QI, and explain how they complement each other.
- Why is project selection important in QI work? What criteria should teams use to prioritize?
- What does SFMEA help you assess, and why is it especially relevant in high-stakes pediatric mental health processes like suicide risk screening?
Knowledge and Awareness
- Research seeks new generalizable knowledge and tests a hypothesis with a fixed protocol; QI applies existing knowledge to improve a specific local process, using rapid, iterative small-scale tests (e.g., PDSA cycles) rather than a fixed, unchanging protocol.
- B) Fishbone diagram — it organizes potential causes of a problem into categories to identify root causes.
- Quantitative: a measure like the percentage of patients screened or wait-time data. Qualitative: staff or family feedback/interviews. Together, they complement each other because the numbers show what is happening (the size and trend of a problem) while the narrative feedback explains why it's happening, which helps teams design the right change ideas.
Application
- Project selection matters because teams have limited time and resources; picking the right project focuses effort where it will have the greatest impact. Criteria for prioritizing include alignment with organizational or program goals, potential impact on patients/families, feasibility given available resources, urgency or safety risk, and data showing a clear gap or opportunity.
- SFMEA (Safety/Systems Failure Modes and Effects Analysis) helps teams proactively identify where a process could fail before an error occurs, rather than waiting to react after harm happens. This is especially relevant to suicide risk screening because the stakes of a missed or delayed step are extremely high, so anticipating failure points in advance helps prevent serious harm.